VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - VGG.TO tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index while PDC.TO tracks the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO returned 13.23%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for PDC.TO. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VGG.TO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDC.TO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 25.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO has outperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 13.23%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.
VGG.TO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.25%
PDC.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 21.53%
- YTD
- 25.42%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$73.84K | CA$71.47K | CA$90.55K | |
| CA$900.74K | CA$1.26M | CA$1.26M |
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 11.79% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 22.23% | 12.67% | 23.32% | 5.20% | 13.99% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 25.42% | 21.80% | 16.38% | 6.97% | -4.17% | 30.14% | -5.48% | 25.00% | -11.85% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and PDC.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2013 | 0.46 |
The correlation between VGG.TO and PDC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Financial Services
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Healthcare
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
-
Industrials
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Defensive
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Basic Materials
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Energy
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Utilities
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Communication Services
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
Real Estate
VGG.TO
-
PDC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
PDC.TO
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGG.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.87 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 9.99 | -7.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 36.59 | -26.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, smaller than the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and PDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -41.93% | +17.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -3.86% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -10.43% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -17.98% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | -41.93% | +17.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -1.06% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -4.47% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.05% | +0.87% |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) at 2.78%. This indicates that VGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 2.78% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 6.60% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 8.70% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 10.85% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 15.28% | -0.31% |
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than PDC.TO's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.17% | 3.96% | 4.48% | 4.77% | 4.24% | 3.65% | 5.07% | 4.33% | 5.12% | 4.23% | 3.77% | 4.39% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for VGG.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and PDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer