PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than HTA.TO's 26.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO has underperformed HTA.TO with an annualized return of 13.46%, while HTA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.58% annualized return.


VGG.TO

1D
0.23%
1M
6.00%
YTD
8.57%
6M
6.30%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
13.46%

HTA.TO

1D
-0.94%
1M
16.27%
YTD
26.21%
6M
26.86%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
26.62%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
20.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGG.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF
8.57%8.61%26.49%11.58%-4.21%22.23%12.67%23.32%5.20%13.99%
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF
26.21%12.42%23.53%52.86%-32.21%42.59%30.02%32.48%-0.73%34.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VGG.TO and HTA.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.55

The correlation between VGG.TO and HTA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGG.TO
HTA.TO

Technology

26.2%
90.1%

Financial Services

20.6%

-

Healthcare

16.5%

-

Industrials

11.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Utilities

3.2%

-

Communication Services

0.5%
9.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VGG.TO
26.2%
HTA.TO
90.1%

Financial Services

VGG.TO
20.6%
HTA.TO

-

Healthcare

VGG.TO
16.5%
HTA.TO

-

Industrials

VGG.TO
11.8%
HTA.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

VGG.TO
10.1%
HTA.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

VGG.TO
4.7%
HTA.TO

-

Energy

VGG.TO
3.5%
HTA.TO

-

Basic Materials

VGG.TO
3.5%
HTA.TO

-

Utilities

VGG.TO
3.2%
HTA.TO

-

Communication Services

VGG.TO
0.5%
HTA.TO
9.9%

Real Estate

VGG.TO

-

HTA.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGG.TO
VGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HTA.TO
HTA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGG.TOHTA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.03

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

10.32

+0.62

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGG.TO and HTA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGG.TOHTA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.52

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.76

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.90

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.74

+0.25

Drawdowns

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, smaller than the maximum HTA.TO drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and HTA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGG.TOHTA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.58%

-38.77%

+14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-14.87%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-25.02%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-38.77%

+20.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.58%

-38.77%

+14.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.94%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-8.23%

+5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

4.36%

-2.47%

Volatility

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) is 2.59%, while Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that VGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGG.TOHTA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

5.64%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

14.56%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.23%

17.91%

-7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

23.53%

-10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

23.08%

-8.11%

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGG.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HTA.TO's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGG.TO vs. HTA.TO - Dividend Comparison

VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than HTA.TO's 7.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF
7.70%8.80%8.11%7.81%9.99%4.27%5.52%6.12%7.58%7.03%8.74%5.29%
VGG.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF
1.02%1.16%1.23%1.37%1.35%1.21%1.25%1.24%1.50%1.46%1.63%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGG.TO and HTA.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HTA.TO.

VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while HTA.TO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGG.TO and 0.99% for HTA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and HTA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer