VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and FLVC.NEO (Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while FLVC.NEO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VGG.TO returned 20.71% vs 36.38% for FLVC.NEO. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VGG.TO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLVC.NEO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLVC.NEO's 21.78% return.
VGG.TO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.25%
FLVC.NEO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 21.86%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$134.83K | CA$145.15K | CA$488.47K | |
| CA$900.74K | CA$1.26M | CA$1.26M |
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 11.79% | 8.61% | 16.05% |
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 21.78% | 21.15% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.35 |
The correlation between VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Financial Services
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Healthcare
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
-
Industrials
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Consumer Defensive
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Basic Materials
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Energy
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Utilities
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Communication Services
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
Real Estate
VGG.TO
-
FLVC.NEO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGG.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 2.02 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 12.45 | -9.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 55.03 | -44.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, which is greater than FLVC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -7.89% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -3.21% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -0.50% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -0.80% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.71% | +1.21% |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) at 2.84%. This indicates that VGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLVC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 2.84% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 5.74% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 7.91% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 11.38% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 11.38% | +3.59% |
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVC.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FLVC.NEO's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.70% | 4.96% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for VGG.TO.
VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FLVC.NEO is Canada Equities. VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while FLVC.NEO tracks Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for VGG.TO and 0.15% for FLVC.NEO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer