PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLVC.NEO's 21.78% return.


VGG.TO

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.33%
6M
9.17%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
13.23%
ALL TIME*
14.25%

FLVC.NEO

1D
0.33%
1M
3.35%
6M
21.86%
YTD
21.78%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$134.83KCA$145.15KCA$488.47K
CA$900.74KCA$1.26MCA$1.26M

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.35

The correlation between VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGG.TO
FLVC.NEO

Technology

29.0%
2.0%

Financial Services

19.9%
43.0%

Healthcare

16.6%

-

Industrials

11.3%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
7.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
0.4%

Energy

3.2%
8.8%

Utilities

2.9%
10.8%

Communication Services

0.5%
7.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VGG.TO
29.0%
FLVC.NEO
2.0%

Financial Services

VGG.TO
19.9%
FLVC.NEO
43.0%

Healthcare

VGG.TO
16.6%
FLVC.NEO

-

Industrials

VGG.TO
11.3%
FLVC.NEO
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

VGG.TO
9.3%
FLVC.NEO
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VGG.TO
4.4%
FLVC.NEO
7.0%

Basic Materials

VGG.TO
3.3%
FLVC.NEO
0.4%

Energy

VGG.TO
3.2%
FLVC.NEO
8.8%

Utilities

VGG.TO
2.9%
FLVC.NEO
10.8%

Communication Services

VGG.TO
0.5%
FLVC.NEO
7.5%

Real Estate

VGG.TO

-

FLVC.NEO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGG.TO
VGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FLVC.NEO
FLVC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGG.TOFLVC.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.02

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

12.45

-9.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

55.03

-44.99

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, which is greater than FLVC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGG.TOFLVC.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.58%

-7.89%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-3.21%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-0.50%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-0.80%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.71%

+1.21%

Volatility

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) at 2.84%. This indicates that VGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLVC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGG.TOFLVC.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

2.84%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

5.74%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

7.91%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

11.38%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

11.38%

+3.59%

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGG.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVC.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGG.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Dividend Comparison

VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FLVC.NEO's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLVC.NEO
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.70%4.96%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGG.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF
1.03%1.16%1.23%1.37%1.35%1.21%1.25%1.24%1.50%1.45%1.63%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for VGG.TO.

VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FLVC.NEO is Canada Equities. VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while FLVC.NEO tracks Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for VGG.TO and 0.15% for FLVC.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and FLVC.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer