PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGEM.DE achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than IS02.DE's 2.97% return.


VGEM.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
1.24%
YTD
2.34%
6M
1.63%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*

IS02.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.71%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.72%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VGEM.DE
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
2.34%-1.55%12.06%5.25%-10.22%5.82%-0.85%
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.97%1.10%11.83%6.71%-13.12%5.72%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VGEM.DE and IS02.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020

0.91

The correlation between VGEM.DE and IS02.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGEM.DE
VGEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VGEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IS02.DE
IS02.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGEM.DEIS02.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.11

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

8.98

-3.28

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGEM.DE and IS02.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGEM.DEIS02.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.57

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.33

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.27

+0.01

Drawdowns

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than IS02.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGEM.DE and IS02.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGEM.DEIS02.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-16.21%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-3.00%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.98%

-12.85%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.46%

-16.21%

+3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

0.00%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-5.92%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.04%

+0.13%

Volatility

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) have volatilities of 1.18% and 1.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGEM.DEIS02.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.19%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.96%

3.97%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

5.94%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.89%

8.53%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.77%

8.34%

+0.43%

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IS02.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGEM.DE vs. IS02.DE - Dividend Comparison

VGEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, while IS02.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGEM.DE
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.06%5.60%5.23%5.14%4.84%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.84%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGEM.DE and IS02.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IS02.DE.

VGEM.DE tracks Bloomberg EM USD Sovereign + Quasi-Sov, while IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VGEM.DE and 0.45% for IS02.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGEM.DE and IS02.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer