PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGEJ.DE achieves a 50.18% return, which is significantly lower than IQQT.DE's 70.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VGEJ.DE has underperformed IQQT.DE with an annualized return of 15.36%, while IQQT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.81% annualized return.


VGEJ.DE

1D
-3.08%
1M
7.14%
YTD
50.18%
6M
54.46%
1Y
78.68%
3Y*
26.79%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
15.36%

IQQT.DE

1D
-1.61%
1M
12.50%
YTD
70.08%
6M
72.22%
1Y
110.41%
3Y*
40.38%
5Y*
22.82%
10Y*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGEJ.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
50.18%24.74%3.34%10.27%-4.11%14.06%11.18%25.07%-6.90%14.80%
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
70.08%17.20%30.72%24.49%-25.21%38.46%22.44%39.61%-5.81%12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VGEJ.DE and IQQT.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2015

0.59

The correlation between VGEJ.DE and IQQT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGEJ.DE
VGEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VGEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQT.DE
IQQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGEJ.DEIQQT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.72

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.17

12.46

-6.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.13

35.53

-11.40

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is comparable to the IQQT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGEJ.DE and IQQT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGEJ.DEIQQT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

4.62

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

1.03

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.04

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.48

+0.30

Drawdowns

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.78%, smaller than the maximum IQQT.DE drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGEJ.DE and IQQT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGEJ.DEIQQT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.78%

-57.60%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-8.93%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-31.65%

+11.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.66%

-32.51%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-32.51%

-4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-1.61%

-2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-12.71%

+7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.14%

+0.17%

Volatility

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) have volatilities of 10.63% and 10.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGEJ.DEIQQT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

10.13%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.75%

19.53%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.99%

24.10%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

21.89%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

20.80%

-1.51%

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGEJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQT.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGEJ.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Dividend Comparison

VGEJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than IQQT.DE's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQT.DE
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.89%1.51%1.36%2.17%3.61%1.31%1.80%2.17%2.76%2.74%2.91%3.26%
VGEJ.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.80%2.75%5.36%7.33%7.98%7.49%4.34%6.92%7.83%4.28%3.08%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGEJ.DE and IQQT.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGEJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGEJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.

VGEJ.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan, while IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VGEJ.DE and 0.74% for IQQT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGEJ.DE and IQQT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer