PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than QUU.TO's 13.03% return.


VFV.TO

1D
-2.35%
1M
2.71%
YTD
10.06%
6M
8.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QUU.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
13.03%
6M
11.82%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
24.45%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
10.06%14.91%
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
13.03%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VFV.TO and QUU.TO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.95

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFV.TO
QUU.TO

Technology

35.7%
35.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.5%

Communication Services

11.3%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.8%

Industrials

8.3%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.6%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

VFV.TO
35.7%
QUU.TO
35.3%

Financial Services

VFV.TO
11.6%
QUU.TO
11.5%

Communication Services

VFV.TO
11.3%
QUU.TO
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VFV.TO
10.2%
QUU.TO
10.0%

Healthcare

VFV.TO
8.5%
QUU.TO
8.8%

Industrials

VFV.TO
8.3%
QUU.TO
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VFV.TO
4.9%
QUU.TO
4.8%

Energy

VFV.TO
3.5%
QUU.TO
3.6%

Utilities

VFV.TO
2.4%
QUU.TO
2.3%

Real Estate

VFV.TO
1.9%
QUU.TO
1.8%

Basic Materials

VFV.TO
1.8%
QUU.TO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFV.TO

QUU.TO
QUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFV.TOQUU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.30

0.92

+1.38

Drawdowns

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum QUU.TO drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and QUU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFV.TOQUU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-26.86%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

0.00%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-4.42%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

Volatility

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFV.TOQUU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

12.23%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.65%

15.30%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

17.29%

-5.64%

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QUU.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Dividend Comparison

VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QUU.TO's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
0.88%0.97%1.00%1.21%1.59%0.98%1.34%1.59%1.55%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.85%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VFV.TO and QUU.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFV.TO.

VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while QUU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.07% for QUU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and QUU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer