VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO
VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) and QUU.TO (Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while QUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VFV.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for QUU.TO.
Performance
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than QUU.TO's 13.03% return.
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUU.TO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 31.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.45%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 10.06% | 14.91% |
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 13.03% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFV.TO and QUU.TO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.95 |
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Financial Services
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Communication Services
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Healthcare
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Industrials
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Consumer Defensive
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Energy
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Utilities
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Real Estate
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Basic Materials
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VFV.TO
QUU.TO
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFV.TO | QUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.30 | 0.92 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum QUU.TO drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and QUU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFV.TO | QUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -26.86% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | 0.00% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -4.42% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.36% | — |
Volatility
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFV.TO | QUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 12.23% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 15.30% | -3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 17.29% | -5.64% |
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QUU.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFV.TO vs. QUU.TO - Dividend Comparison
VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QUU.TO's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 0.88% | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 0.98% | 1.34% | 1.59% | 1.55% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VFV.TO and QUU.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFV.TO.
VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while QUU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.07% for QUU.TO.
Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and QUU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer