VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO
VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) and QQQT.TO (Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while QQQT.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFV.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QQQT.TO.
Performance
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFV.TO achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT.TO's 29.42% return.
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQT.TO
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 29.42%
- 6M
- 26.01%
- 1Y
- 63.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 10.06% | 14.91% |
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged | 29.42% | 25.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFV.TO and QQQT.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VFV.TO
QQQT.TO
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFV.TO | QQQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.30 | 1.42 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFV.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum QQQT.TO drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFV.TO and QQQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFV.TO | QQQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -30.32% | +21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -1.87% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -5.10% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.59% | — |
Volatility
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFV.TO | QQQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 21.68% | -10.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 26.24% | -14.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 26.24% | -14.59% |
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFV.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFV.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than QQQT.TO's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.25% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFV.TO and QQQT.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQT.TO.
VFV.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQT.TO is Nasdaq-100. VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while QQQT.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFV.TO and 0.25% for QQQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for VFV.TO and QQQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer