PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFSUX vs. VTABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFSUX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than VTABX's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VFSUX has outperformed VTABX with an annualized return of 2.61%, while VTABX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return.


VFSUX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
2.61%

VTABX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.91%
1Y
1.74%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
1.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFSUX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares
0.72%6.87%5.08%6.17%-5.75%-0.62%5.26%5.85%0.98%2.13%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.56%2.96%3.92%8.77%-12.92%-2.22%4.54%8.83%2.97%2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VFSUX and VTABX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.57

The correlation between VFSUX and VTABX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFSUX
VTABX

Communication Services

100.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

100.0%
0.0%

Technology

0.1%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Communication Services

VFSUX
100.0%
VTABX
0.0%

Healthcare

VFSUX
100.0%
VTABX
0.0%

Technology

VFSUX
0.1%
VTABX
100.0%

Real Estate

VFSUX
0.0%
VTABX
0.0%

Basic Materials

VFSUX

-

VTABX

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFSUX

-

VTABX

-

Consumer Defensive

VFSUX

-

VTABX

-

Energy

VFSUX

-

VTABX
0.0%

Financial Services

VFSUX

-

VTABX
0.0%

Industrials

VFSUX

-

VTABX
0.0%

Utilities

VFSUX

-

VTABX
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFSUX vs. VTABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFSUX
VFSUX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VFSUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFSUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFSUX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VFSUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFSUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VTABX
VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFSUXVTABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.11

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

0.67

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

1.84

+8.74

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFSUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the VTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFSUX and VTABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFSUX drawdown since its inception was -9.24%, smaller than the maximum VTABX drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFSUX and VTABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFSUXVTABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-16.16%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.71%

-2.90%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.71%

-2.90%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.24%

-15.81%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.24%

-16.16%

+6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.30%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-3.04%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

1.06%

-0.62%

Volatility

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX) is 0.77%, while Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that VFSUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFSUXVTABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.27%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

2.61%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

3.08%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

4.45%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.49%

3.62%

-1.13%

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFSUX and VTABX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFSUX vs. VTABX - Dividend Comparison

VFSUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than VTABX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFSUX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares
4.72%4.59%4.16%3.14%2.03%1.79%2.34%2.92%2.79%2.11%2.14%2.09%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.46%4.36%4.33%4.39%1.48%3.70%1.08%4.28%3.00%2.23%1.80%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFSUX and VTABX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTABX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to VFSUX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFSUX dropped -9.24% vs VTABX's -16.16%.

VFSUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFSUX and VTABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer