VFMO vs. PTF
VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. VFMO is actively managed, while PTF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMO returned 13.84%/yr vs 23.79%/yr for PTF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
VFMO vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 77.58% return.
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 77.58%
- 6M
- 74.93%
- 1Y
- 109.08%
- 3Y*
- 43.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.79%
- 10Y*
- 26.93%
VFMO vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 77.58% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | -7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMO and PTF is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VFMO and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFMO vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMO
PTF
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
VFMO
PTF
Healthcare
VFMO
PTF
-
Technology
VFMO
PTF
Consumer Cyclical
VFMO
PTF
-
Energy
VFMO
PTF
Financial Services
VFMO
PTF
Basic Materials
VFMO
PTF
-
Communication Services
VFMO
PTF
Consumer Defensive
VFMO
PTF
-
Utilities
VFMO
PTF
-
Real Estate
VFMO
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMO vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
VFMO
PTF
VFMO vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMO | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 6.10 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.97 | 24.27 | -9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMO | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.86 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.68 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.54 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
VFMO vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMO | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -55.38% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -17.99% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | -36.11% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -44.88% | +19.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -13.27% | +5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 4.51% | -1.61% |
Volatility
VFMO vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) is 6.20%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that VFMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMO | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 13.27% | -7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 29.47% | -13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.20% | 38.39% | -17.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 34.95% | -13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 32.94% | -9.37% |
VFMO vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMO vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMO and PTF have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to VFMO (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 23.79% vs 13.84% for VFMO. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.60% for PTF.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMO and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer