PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMFX vs. VSTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMFX achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly lower than VSTCX's 21.48% return.


VFMFX

1D
0.56%
1M
2.64%
YTD
16.42%
6M
14.86%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*

VSTCX

1D
0.53%
1M
5.17%
YTD
21.48%
6M
19.28%
1Y
44.51%
3Y*
23.26%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMFX
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares
16.42%14.50%17.21%17.89%-5.78%30.78%3.58%21.81%-14.83%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
21.48%15.20%15.40%21.34%-13.00%33.53%8.38%22.18%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMFX and VSTCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.96

The correlation between VFMFX and VSTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMFX vs. VSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMFX
VFMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VFMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VSTCX
VSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFMFXVSTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

5.74

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

20.24

-2.77

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the VSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMFX and VSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMFX drawdown since its inception was -41.18%, smaller than the maximum VSTCX drawdown of -62.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMFX and VSTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMFXVSTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.18%

-62.50%

+21.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-8.08%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-27.47%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.18%

-27.47%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

0.00%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-10.62%

+4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.29%

-0.33%

Volatility

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) is 3.30%, while Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that VFMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMFXVSTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

5.06%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

12.50%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

17.89%

-4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

22.01%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

23.50%

-2.29%

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMFX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VSTCX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMFX vs. VSTCX - Dividend Comparison

VFMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than VSTCX's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMFX
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares
2.34%2.69%3.29%1.66%2.09%1.37%1.48%1.63%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
6.21%7.55%9.66%2.50%7.44%19.92%1.24%4.14%11.74%5.76%1.35%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VFMFX and VSTCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSTCX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to VFMFX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMFX dropped -41.18% vs VSTCX's -62.50%.

VSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMFX and VSTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer