VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L
VFEG.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) and ENCG.L (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFEG.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while ENCG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VFEG.L returned 15.18%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for ENCG.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFEG.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENCG.L.
Performance
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VFEG.L is traded in GBP, while ENCG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ENCG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFEG.L achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than ENCG.L's 24.41% return.
VFEG.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- —
ENCG.L
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 24.41%
- 6M
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFEG.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 11.73% | 17.15% | 14.13% | 1.28% | -7.26% | -3.03% |
ENCG.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF | 24.41% | 0.89% | 5.39% | -7.83% | 38.17% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFEG.L and ENCG.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021 | 0.12 |
The correlation between VFEG.L and ENCG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Financial Services
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Basic Materials
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Communication Services
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Industrials
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Energy
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Healthcare
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Utilities
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
-
Real Estate
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VFEG.L
ENCG.L
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) and L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFEG.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 4.02 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 10.88 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFEG.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 1.91 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.79 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFEG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.35%, roughly equal to the maximum ENCG.L drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEG.L and ENCG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFEG.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.35% | -26.32% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -8.38% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.61% | -17.11% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -4.28% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -13.09% | +4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.11% | -0.36% |
Volatility
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) is 5.09%, while L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VFEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFEG.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 6.29% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 14.33% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 17.67% | -3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 18.12% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 18.12% | -0.68% |
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFEG.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFEG.L vs. ENCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VFEG.L nor ENCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VFEG.L and ENCG.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFEG.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFEG.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENCG.L.
VFEG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ENCG.L is Commodities. VFEG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while ENCG.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VFEG.L and 0.30% for ENCG.L.
Find the right allocation for VFEG.L and ENCG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer