PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFEA.DE achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than H410.DE's 19.79% return.


VFEA.DE

1D
-2.07%
1M
-3.40%
6M
4.93%
YTD
10.01%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*

H410.DE

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.04%
6M
12.07%
YTD
19.79%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFEA.DE
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
10.01%11.25%19.29%3.32%-10.71%6.34%3.46%0.02%
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
19.79%18.65%13.95%4.67%-13.87%4.04%6.95%9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VFEA.DE and H410.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.96

The correlation between VFEA.DE and H410.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFEA.DE
VFEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

H410.DE
H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFEA.DEH410.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.17

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

9.64

-2.60

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the H410.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFEA.DE and H410.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.51%, smaller than the maximum H410.DE drawdown of -41.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEA.DE and H410.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFEA.DEH410.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.51%

-41.02%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-10.71%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-19.01%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.98%

-22.77%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-10.71%

+5.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-13.30%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.53%

-0.84%

Volatility

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE) is 5.41%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that VFEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H410.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFEA.DEH410.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

8.22%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

17.70%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

20.15%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

17.18%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.51%

18.31%

+0.20%

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFEA.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than H410.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFEA.DE vs. H410.DE - Dividend Comparison

VFEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
1.71%2.00%2.40%2.59%3.11%2.00%1.69%2.03%2.20%1.62%1.71%2.28%
VFEA.DE
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VFEA.DE and H410.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H410.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H410.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VFEA.DE.

VFEA.DE tracks FTSE Emerging, while H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VFEA.DE and 0.15% for H410.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFEA.DE and H410.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer