VEXC vs. QAT
VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index while QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEXC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.
Performance
VEXC vs. QAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEXC achieves a 20.21% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's -0.42% return.
VEXC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 20.21%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QAT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
VEXC vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.21% | 4.80% |
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | -0.42% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEXC and QAT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEXC vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank
VEXC
QAT
VEXC vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEXC | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.21 | 0.07 | +2.15 |
Drawdowns
VEXC vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEXC drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum QAT drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEXC and QAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEXC | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.42% | -45.21% | +32.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -12.80% | +11.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -19.18% | +16.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.54% | — |
Volatility
VEXC vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEXC | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 13.36% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 15.00% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 17.56% | +1.33% |
VEXC vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEXC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEXC vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison
VEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than QAT's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 3.52% | 3.51% | 5.90% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 3.57% | 4.63% | 4.10% | 3.51% | 4.49% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 0.74% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEXC and QAT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for QAT.
QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.
VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VEXC and 0.59% for QAT.
Find the right allocation for VEXC and QAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer