VEXC vs. QAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT).

VEXC and QAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VEXC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2025. QAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014. Both VEXC and QAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VEXC vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VEXC vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	2.61%	4.80%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	-1.16%	-1.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEXC achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's -1.16% return.

VEXC

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: -8.07%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 6M: -3.61%
• 1Y: 8.10%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 3.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEXC vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEXC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.

QAT

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

VEXC

Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF

Return for Risk

VEXC vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAT

QAT Risk / Return Rank: 31
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEXC vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VEXC	QAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.07	+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between VEXC and QAT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VEXC vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

VEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than QAT's 3.55% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	0.86%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	3.55%	3.51%	5.90%	3.92%	4.78%	2.33%	2.63%	3.57%	4.63%	4.10%	3.51%	4.49%

Drawdowns

VEXC vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEXC drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum QAT drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEXC and QAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEXC	QAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.42%	-45.21%	+32.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.57%	-13.45%	+3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-19.29%	+17.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VEXC	QAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	13.22%	+4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.51%	14.84%	+2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.51%	17.60%	-0.09%