PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEVRX vs. GTTMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVRX achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than GTTMX's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, VEVRX has underperformed GTTMX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while GTTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.


VEVRX

1D
1.01%
1M
1.63%
YTD
11.17%
6M
10.75%
1Y
16.34%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
11.05%

GTTMX

1D
0.49%
1M
5.06%
YTD
13.29%
6M
15.08%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEVRX
Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6
11.17%2.66%10.18%10.46%-2.51%31.96%8.15%28.84%-10.04%16.09%
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
13.29%18.40%14.84%9.39%-13.90%41.28%5.12%24.18%-11.99%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVRX and GTTMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.90

The correlation between VEVRX and GTTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEVRX vs. GTTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEVRX
VEVRX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VEVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GTTMX
GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEVRXGTTMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

4.64

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

15.63

-8.40

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the GTTMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVRX and GTTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEVRXGTTMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.04

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.56

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.61

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.42

+0.10

Drawdowns

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVRX drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, smaller than the maximum GTTMX drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVRX and GTTMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEVRXGTTMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.00%

-56.24%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-6.51%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

-20.62%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.25%

-24.12%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

-44.59%

+3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-10.25%

+5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

1.92%

+0.47%

Volatility

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX) is 3.11%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that VEVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEVRXGTTMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.96%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

10.84%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

14.84%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

18.32%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

20.50%

-1.29%

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEVRX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTMX's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEVRX vs. GTTMX - Dividend Comparison

VEVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than GTTMX's 16.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
16.64%18.85%14.45%5.83%0.40%17.50%11.58%5.95%9.88%3.00%0.55%0.59%
VEVRX
Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6
4.69%4.81%11.61%6.20%8.30%8.42%5.50%6.12%10.72%3.36%1.53%11.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEVRX and GTTMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTMX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to VEVRX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEVRX dropped -41.00% vs GTTMX's -56.24%.

GTTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEVRX and GTTMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer