PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVE.L achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than VMID.L's 5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VEVE.L has outperformed VMID.L with an annualized return of 14.06%, while VMID.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.


VEVE.L

1D
1.79%
1M
0.63%
YTD
10.77%
6M
11.37%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
14.06%

VMID.L

1D
1.50%
1M
2.52%
YTD
5.31%
6M
8.31%
1Y
13.76%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
10.77%13.81%20.22%17.46%-8.34%22.68%12.44%22.89%-4.39%12.62%
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing
5.31%12.87%7.44%8.18%-17.37%16.04%-4.93%29.14%-13.13%17.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVE.L and VMID.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.64

The correlation between VEVE.L and VMID.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEVE.L
VMID.L

Technology

29.0%
9.4%

Financial Services

15.6%
19.4%

Industrials

11.5%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
13.3%

Communication Services

9.0%
5.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.1%

Energy

4.1%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%
6.6%

Utilities

2.6%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
9.4%

Technology

VEVE.L
29.0%
VMID.L
9.4%

Financial Services

VEVE.L
15.6%
VMID.L
19.4%

Industrials

VEVE.L
11.5%
VMID.L
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VEVE.L
9.3%
VMID.L
13.3%

Communication Services

VEVE.L
9.0%
VMID.L
5.9%

Healthcare

VEVE.L
8.5%
VMID.L
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

VEVE.L
5.1%
VMID.L
6.1%

Energy

VEVE.L
4.1%
VMID.L
2.5%

Basic Materials

VEVE.L
3.4%
VMID.L
6.6%

Utilities

VEVE.L
2.6%
VMID.L
3.0%

Real Estate

VEVE.L
2.0%
VMID.L
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEVE.L
VEVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VMID.L
VMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEVE.LVMID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.19

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

1.09

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.94

3.91

+12.03

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the VMID.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVE.L and VMID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.53%, smaller than the maximum VMID.L drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVE.L and VMID.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEVE.LVMID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.53%

-41.85%

+16.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-11.54%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-15.98%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-29.52%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.53%

-41.85%

+16.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.67%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-7.79%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.23%

-1.50%

Volatility

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEVE.LVMID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.69%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

10.39%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.64%

12.54%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

15.19%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

16.53%

-2.18%

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VMID.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Dividend Comparison

VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than VMID.L's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.24%1.38%1.48%1.71%1.98%1.46%1.62%1.95%2.24%1.93%1.88%2.03%
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing
3.64%3.90%3.30%3.41%3.30%2.55%2.08%2.82%3.59%3.19%3.08%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEVE.L and VMID.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VMID.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VMID.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VEVE.L.

VEVE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VMID.L is Europe Equities. VEVE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VMID.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VEVE.L and 0.10% for VMID.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEVE.L and VMID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer