VEVE.L vs. VMID.L
VEVE.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing) and VMID.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - VEVE.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VMID.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEVE.L returned 14.06%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for VMID.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEVE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VMID.L.
Performance
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEVE.L achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than VMID.L's 5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VEVE.L has outperformed VMID.L with an annualized return of 14.06%, while VMID.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.
VEVE.L
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
VMID.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 13.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing | 10.77% | 13.81% | 20.22% | 17.46% | -8.34% | 22.68% | 12.44% | 22.89% | -4.39% | 12.62% |
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 5.31% | 12.87% | 7.44% | 8.18% | -17.37% | 16.04% | -4.93% | 29.14% | -13.13% | 17.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEVE.L and VMID.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between VEVE.L and VMID.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Financial Services
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Industrials
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Consumer Cyclical
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Communication Services
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Healthcare
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Consumer Defensive
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Energy
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Basic Materials
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Utilities
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Real Estate
VEVE.L
VMID.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L — Risk / Return Rank
VEVE.L
VMID.L
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEVE.L | VMID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.19 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 1.09 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 3.91 | +12.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEVE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.53%, smaller than the maximum VMID.L drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVE.L and VMID.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEVE.L | VMID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.53% | -41.85% | +16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -11.54% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -15.98% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.34% | -29.52% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.53% | -41.85% | +16.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.67% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -7.79% | +4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.23% | -1.50% |
Volatility
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEVE.L | VMID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 3.69% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 10.39% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 12.54% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 15.19% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 16.53% | -2.18% |
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VMID.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEVE.L vs. VMID.L - Dividend Comparison
VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than VMID.L's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.88% | 2.03% |
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.64% | 3.90% | 3.30% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 2.55% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 3.59% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEVE.L and VMID.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMID.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMID.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VEVE.L.
VEVE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VMID.L is Europe Equities. VEVE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VMID.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VEVE.L and 0.10% for VMID.L.
Find the right allocation for VEVE.L and VMID.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer