VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L
VEUA.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VEUA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UIFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VEUA.L returned 10.11%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for UIFS.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEUA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VEUA.L is traded in GBP, while UIFS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UIFS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEUA.L achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -2.31% return.
VEUA.L
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 19.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 7.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEUA.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating | 7.77% | 26.07% | 4.49% | 13.46% | -4.21% | 16.83% | 3.08% | -9.21% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.31% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEUA.L and UIFS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between VEUA.L and UIFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
Industrials
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
Healthcare
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Technology
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
Consumer Defensive
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Basic Materials
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Energy
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Utilities
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Communication Services
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Real Estate
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VEUA.L
UIFS.L
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEUA.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.10 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.61 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 1.40 | +5.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEUA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.39%, smaller than the maximum UIFS.L drawdown of -44.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUA.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEUA.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.39% | -44.49% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -12.90% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.63% | -20.12% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -20.12% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -4.29% | +3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -9.19% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 5.60% | -2.63% |
Volatility
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) is 3.55%, while iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that VEUA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEUA.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 4.49% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 10.75% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 14.10% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 22.50% | -6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 22.43% | -4.76% |
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEUA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEUA.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VEUA.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VEUA.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEUA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEUA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UIFS.L.
VEUA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UIFS.L is Financials Equities. VEUA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VEUA.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for VEUA.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer