PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VETA.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VETA.L is traded in GBP, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


VETA.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
-0.92%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
-2.10%
10Y*

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VETA.L
Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.82%5.79%-2.93%4.76%-3.95%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between VETA.L and PRWU.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VETA.L
VETA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VETA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VETA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VETA.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VETA.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

Drawdowns

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VETA.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VETA.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VETA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VETA.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VETA.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VETA.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VETA.L.

VETA.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while PRWU.L is Global Equities. VETA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while PRWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VETA.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VETA.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer