VERS vs. TSXU
VERS (ProShares Metaverse ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - VERS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VERS charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
VERS vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 36.54% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
VERS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 23.22%
- YTD
- 36.54%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 68.21%
- 3Y*
- 31.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VERS vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 36.54% | 0.39% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VERS and TSXU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VERS vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
VERS
TSXU
VERS vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VERS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VERS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 4.53 | -3.96 |
Drawdowns
VERS vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VERS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -35.62% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.92% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -10.56% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | — | — |
Volatility
VERS vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VERS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.54% | 78.68% | -52.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 78.68% | -47.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 78.68% | -47.42% |
VERS vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
VERS vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VERS and TSXU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VERS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VERS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.24% for VERS.
VERS is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. VERS tracks Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for VERS and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer