VERS vs. SOXX
VERS (ProShares Metaverse ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VERS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VERS returned 31.89%/yr vs 57.39%/yr for SOXX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VERS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
VERS vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 36.54% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return.
VERS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 23.22%
- YTD
- 36.54%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 68.21%
- 3Y*
- 31.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
VERS vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 36.54% | 26.16% | 16.92% | 51.13% | -34.52% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -24.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VERS and SOXX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VERS and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VERS vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VERS
SOXX
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
VERS
SOXX
Communication Services
VERS
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
VERS
SOXX
-
Real Estate
VERS
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
VERS
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
VERS
-
SOXX
-
Energy
VERS
-
SOXX
-
Financial Services
VERS
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
VERS
-
SOXX
-
Industrials
VERS
-
SOXX
-
Utilities
VERS
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VERS vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
VERS
SOXX
VERS vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VERS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.74 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 12.13 | -9.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 46.43 | -37.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VERS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 5.61 | -3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.45 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
VERS vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VERS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.13% | -70.21% | +28.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -15.77% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | -41.36% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | 0.00% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -19.97% | +4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 4.11% | +3.81% |
Volatility
VERS vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is 9.76%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that VERS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VERS | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 14.03% | -4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 27.35% | -6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.54% | 34.18% | -7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 36.11% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 33.43% | -2.17% |
VERS vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
VERS vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VERS and SOXX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to VERS (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERS dropped -42.13% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 3-year performance, SOXX leads with 57.39% vs 31.89% for VERS. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, VERS has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 57.39% return vs 31.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VERS.
SOXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.24% for VERS.
VERS is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. VERS tracks Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VERS and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer