VERS vs. GTEK

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

VERS (ProShares Metaverse ETF) and GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. VERS is passively managed, while GTEK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VERS returned 20.69%/yr vs 29.45%/yr for GTEK. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VERS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GTEK.

Performance

VERS vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than GTEK's 42.08% return.

VERS

• 1D: -2.99%
• 1M: -6.48%
• 6M: 11.82%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 1Y: 33.57%
• 3Y*: 20.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GTEK

• 1D: -4.38%
• 1M: -3.33%
• 6M: 34.40%
• YTD: 42.08%
• 1Y: 59.49%
• 3Y*: 29.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VERS vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF	16.15%	26.16%	16.92%	51.13%	-33.05%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	42.08%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-30.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VERS and GTEK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022	0.88

The correlation between VERS and GTEK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VERS vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VERS	GTEK
Technology	76.6%	74.5%
Communication Services	16.2%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	2.3%
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.2%
Healthcare	-	1.1%
Industrials	-	8.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VERS vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERS

VERS Risk / Return Rank: 36
VERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
VERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
VERS Omega Ratio Rank: 37
VERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
VERS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 81
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERS vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VERS	GTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	2.01	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.56	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.33	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	5.37	-3.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.83	15.79	-11.97

VERS vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERS Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERS and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VERS vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum GTEK drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and GTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	VERS	GTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.13%	-53.77%	+11.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.02%	-11.13%	-11.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.34%	-27.49%	-1.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.78%	-9.70%	-6.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.96%	-26.99%	+12.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.79%	3.78%	+5.01%

Volatility

VERS vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is 11.59%, while Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that VERS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VERS	GTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.59%	12.78%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.68%	26.10%	-1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.89%	29.74%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.71%	28.82%	+2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.71%	28.82%	+2.89%

VERS vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

VERS vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF	0.13%	0.52%	0.58%	0.63%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VERS and GTEK in my portfolio?

VERS and GTEK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VERS or GTEK?

GTEK has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to VERS (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERS dropped -42.13% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

Which ETF is better, VERS or GTEK?

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 29.45% vs 20.69% for VERS. On fees, VERS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VERS has been the lower-risk option at 11.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VERS or GTEK?

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 29.45% return vs 20.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VERS or GTEK?

VERS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VERS or GTEK?

VERS has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between VERS and GTEK?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 0.75% for GTEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.