VERS vs. GOOX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

VERS (ProShares Metaverse ETF) and GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VERS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. VERS is passively managed, while GOOX is actively managed. Over the past year, VERS returned 27.38% vs 189.26% for GOOX. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VERS charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GOOX.

Performance

VERS vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than GOOX's 14.32% return.

VERS

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -6.24%
• 6M: 15.14%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 1Y: 27.38%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.12%

GOOX

• 1D: 14.09%
• 1M: -2.18%
• 6M: -0.73%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 1Y: 189.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 66.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	$8.35M	$6.68M	$7.65M
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF	$14.67K	$12.70K	$32.10K

VERS vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF	10.48%	26.16%	20.22%
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	14.32%	121.41%	44.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VERS and GOOX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.53

The correlation between VERS and GOOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VERS vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VERS

VERS Risk / Return Rank: 30
VERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
VERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
VERS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
VERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VERS Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GOOX

GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 91
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VERS vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VERS	GOOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	2.84	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	3.39	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.41	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	4.63	-3.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	11.97	-9.63

VERS vs. GOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERS Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the GOOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERS and GOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VERS vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum GOOX drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and GOOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VERS	GOOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.13%	-52.46%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.15%	-39.00%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.89%	-24.02%	+4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.01%	-17.47%	+2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.85%	15.07%	-5.22%

Volatility

VERS vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is 10.29%, while T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a volatility of 26.36%. This indicates that VERS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VERS	GOOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.29%	26.36%	-16.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.60%	48.89%	-23.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.77%	63.83%	-33.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.74%	61.81%	-30.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.74%	61.81%	-30.07%

VERS vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

VERS vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison

VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than GOOX's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	0.27%	0.30%	16.78%	0.00%	0.00%
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF	0.14%	0.52%	0.58%	0.63%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VERS and GOOX in my portfolio?

VERS and GOOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VERS or GOOX?

GOOX has higher volatility (26.36%) compared to VERS (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERS dropped -42.13% vs GOOX's -52.46%.

Which ETF is better, VERS or GOOX?

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 189.26% vs 27.38% for VERS. On fees, VERS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VERS has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VERS or GOOX?

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 189.26% return vs 27.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VERS or GOOX?

VERS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VERS or GOOX?

GOOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.14% for VERS.

What is the main difference between VERS and GOOX?

VERS is categorized as Technology Equities, while GOOX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 1.05% for GOOX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.