PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VERG.L vs. MIVO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VERG.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VERG.L is traded in GBP, while MIVO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIVO.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERG.L achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than MIVO.L's 4.24% return.


VERG.L

1D
0.95%
1M
4.22%
YTD
6.82%
6M
9.21%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*

MIVO.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.62%
YTD
4.24%
6M
5.52%
1Y
7.85%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VERG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating
6.82%27.17%1.89%15.33%-7.05%16.27%8.72%1.12%
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
4.24%17.54%6.50%8.50%-7.95%13.43%1.38%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VERG.L and MIVO.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019

0.85

The correlation between VERG.L and MIVO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VERG.L
MIVO.L

Financial Services

23.9%
17.5%

Industrials

21.4%
15.5%

Healthcare

12.7%
13.1%

Technology

10.9%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
13.3%

Utilities

4.9%
10.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
3.6%

Energy

3.4%
9.9%

Communication Services

3.1%
9.5%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.5%

Financial Services

VERG.L
23.9%
MIVO.L
17.5%

Industrials

VERG.L
21.4%
MIVO.L
15.5%

Healthcare

VERG.L
12.7%
MIVO.L
13.1%

Technology

VERG.L
10.9%
MIVO.L
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VERG.L
7.3%
MIVO.L
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

VERG.L
6.6%
MIVO.L
13.3%

Utilities

VERG.L
4.9%
MIVO.L
10.5%

Basic Materials

VERG.L
4.6%
MIVO.L
3.6%

Energy

VERG.L
3.4%
MIVO.L
9.9%

Communication Services

VERG.L
3.1%
MIVO.L
9.5%

Real Estate

VERG.L
1.2%
MIVO.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERG.L
VERG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VERG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VERG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VERG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VERG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VERG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVO.L
MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VERG.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VERG.LMIVO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

0.93

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

2.76

+3.30

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERG.L and MIVO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VERG.LMIVO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

0.88

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.67

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.74

-0.14

Drawdowns

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.55%, which is greater than MIVO.L's maximum drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERG.L and MIVO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VERG.LMIVO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.55%

-24.30%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-8.38%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-8.38%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-17.54%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-4.95%

+4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-3.61%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.84%

+0.32%

Volatility

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VERG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that VERG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VERG.LMIVO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.77%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

7.44%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

8.91%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

10.94%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

12.25%

+4.25%

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VERG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MIVO.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VERG.L vs. MIVO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VERG.L nor MIVO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VERG.L and MIVO.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VERG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VERG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for MIVO.L.

VERG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VERG.L and 0.13% for MIVO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VERG.L and MIVO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer