PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMY vs. KMID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMY vs. KMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMY achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly higher than KMID's 1.82% return.


VEMY

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.70%
YTD
6.30%
6M
6.13%
1Y
17.10%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
10Y*

KMID

1D
0.95%
1M
0.89%
YTD
1.82%
6M
0.24%
1Y
-0.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMY vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.30%15.27%-0.17%
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
1.82%0.31%-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMY and KMID is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMY vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

KMID
KMID Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMY vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEMYKMIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.01

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

-0.02

+4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.31

-0.06

+20.37

VEMY vs. KMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the KMID Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMY and KMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEMY vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMY drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum KMID drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMY and KMID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMYKMIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-18.89%

+10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-10.71%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-5.32%

+4.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-5.74%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

4.37%

-3.53%

Volatility

VEMY vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) is 1.42%, while Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that VEMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMYKMIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

5.06%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

11.74%

-6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.09%

14.86%

-8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.60%

16.98%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.60%

16.98%

-9.38%

VEMY vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMY vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison

VEMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than KMID's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
0.11%0.06%0.05%0.00%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.21%8.89%10.28%9.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMY and KMID have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMID has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to VEMY (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMY dropped -8.77% vs KMID's -18.89%.

On 1-year performance, VEMY leads with 17.10% vs -0.24% for KMID. On fees, VEMY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VEMY has performed better with a 17.10% return vs -0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEMY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 0.11% for KMID.

VEMY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while KMID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VEMY and 0.80% for KMID.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMY and KMID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer