PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMY vs. ASMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMY vs. ASMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMY achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than ASMF's 9.03% return.


VEMY

1D
0.03%
1M
1.22%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.67%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10Y*

ASMF

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.40%
YTD
9.03%
6M
11.01%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMY vs. ASMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VEMY and ASMF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMY vs. ASMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMF
ASMF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ASMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMY vs. ASMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMYASMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.28

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

3.30

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.97

8.73

+13.24

VEMY vs. ASMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMY Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the ASMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMY and ASMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMYASMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

1.49

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.83

0.28

+1.55

Drawdowns

VEMY vs. ASMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMY drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum ASMF drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMY and ASMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMYASMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-15.31%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-5.02%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.66%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-7.60%

+6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.90%

-1.06%

Volatility

VEMY vs. ASMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) is 1.54%, while Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that VEMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMYASMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

2.44%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

9.29%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

11.16%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

10.96%

-3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

10.96%

-3.33%

VEMY vs. ASMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMF's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMY vs. ASMF - Dividend Comparison

VEMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than ASMF's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
0.20%0.22%1.66%0.00%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.37%8.89%10.28%9.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMY and ASMF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMF has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to VEMY (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMY dropped -8.77% vs ASMF's -15.31%.

On 1-year performance, VEMY leads with 18.43% vs 16.52% for ASMF. On fees, VEMY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VEMY has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 16.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEMY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ASMF.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 0.20% for ASMF.

VEMY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while ASMF is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VEMY and 0.80% for ASMF.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMY and ASMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer