PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEMT.L is traded in GBP, while VUCP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VUCP.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMT.L achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than VUCP.DE's 0.94% return.


VEMT.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.13%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*

VUCP.DE

1D
0.24%
1M
1.54%
YTD
0.94%
6M
0.18%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.55%4.07%8.08%3.44%-5.19%-0.56%2.53%9.67%2.79%-1.80%
VUCP.DE
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
0.94%0.76%3.89%2.34%-4.61%-0.49%5.08%11.34%3.32%-1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMT.L and VUCP.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.74

The correlation between VEMT.L and VUCP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VUCP.DE
VUCP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VUCP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUCP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUCP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VUCP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUCP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMT.LVUCP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.19

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.40

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

3.31

+3.55

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the VUCP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMT.L and VUCP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMT.LVUCP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.05

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.20

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.25

+0.06

Drawdowns

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMT.L drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, roughly equal to the maximum VUCP.DE drawdown of -14.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMT.L and VUCP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMT.LVUCP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-14.80%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-4.78%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-8.57%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.41%

-13.27%

+1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-3.15%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-6.27%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

2.02%

-0.49%

Volatility

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) is 1.33%, while Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.DE) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that VEMT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUCP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMT.LVUCP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.57%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

4.43%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

6.38%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

8.66%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.15%

9.50%

-0.35%

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VUCP.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEMT.L vs. VUCP.DE - Dividend Comparison

VEMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than VUCP.DE's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.92%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.44%4.81%
VUCP.DE
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.15%5.41%4.83%4.45%3.56%2.50%3.06%3.27%3.48%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMT.L and VUCP.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUCP.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUCP.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEMT.L.

VEMT.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while VUCP.DE is Corporate Bonds. VEMT.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while VUCP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEMT.L and 0.09% for VUCP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMT.L and VUCP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer