PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMT.L achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than TI5G.L's 2.07% return.


VEMT.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.13%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*

TI5G.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.09%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.55%4.07%8.08%3.44%-5.19%-0.56%2.53%9.67%7.50%
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.07%5.70%4.60%3.62%-3.69%5.28%4.05%3.05%-0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMT.L and TI5G.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.07

The correlation between VEMT.L and TI5G.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

TI5G.L
TI5G.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMT.LTI5G.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

5.26

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

17.49

-10.63

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMT.L and TI5G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMT.LTI5G.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.68

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.94

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.89

-0.58

Drawdowns

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMT.L drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than TI5G.L's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMT.L and TI5G.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMT.LTI5G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-5.63%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-0.83%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-1.55%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.41%

-5.63%

-5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.08%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-1.02%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.25%

+1.28%

Volatility

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) at 0.58%. This indicates that VEMT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TI5G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMT.LTI5G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

0.58%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

1.69%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

2.60%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

3.08%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.15%

3.23%

+5.92%

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TI5G.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEMT.L vs. TI5G.L - Dividend Comparison

VEMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than TI5G.L's 5.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
5.85%5.98%6.83%5.19%0.32%0.34%3.06%3.28%2.36%0.00%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.92%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.44%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMT.L and TI5G.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TI5G.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TI5G.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEMT.L.

VEMT.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while TI5G.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VEMT.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while TI5G.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEMT.L and 0.12% for TI5G.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMT.L and TI5G.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer