PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMT.L achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than JMAB.L's 4.08% return.


VEMT.L

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.15%
YTD
3.78%
6M
4.60%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*

JMAB.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
3.38%
YTD
4.08%
6M
4.62%
1Y
14.01%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.78%4.08%8.08%3.45%-5.21%-0.56%2.53%0.47%
JMAB.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
4.08%5.64%3.61%3.51%-6.11%-1.18%1.75%-21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMT.L and JMAB.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.90

The correlation between VEMT.L and JMAB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

JMAB.L
JMAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JMAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEMT.LJMAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.19

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

8.96

-0.87

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the JMAB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMT.L and JMAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMT.L drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, smaller than the maximum JMAB.L drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMT.L and JMAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMT.LJMAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-31.26%

+16.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.33%

-4.38%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

-8.77%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.41%

-22.71%

+11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-13.53%

+13.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-23.39%

+17.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.56%

-0.02%

Volatility

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMAB.L) at 1.67%. This indicates that VEMT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMT.LJMAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

1.67%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

4.49%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.34%

5.99%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

17.73%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.14%

18.99%

-9.85%

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JMAB.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMT.L vs. JMAB.L - Dividend Comparison

VEMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, while JMAB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMAB.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.81%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.45%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMT.L and JMAB.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEMT.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEMT.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMAB.L.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEMT.L and 0.39% for JMAB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMT.L and JMAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer