PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMRX vs. CNWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMRX achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 51.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VEMRX has underperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 9.10%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.


VEMRX

1D
1.58%
1M
4.23%
YTD
14.01%
6M
15.61%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
9.10%

CNWIX

1D
1.17%
1M
14.41%
YTD
51.09%
6M
54.41%
1Y
72.44%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEMRX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
14.01%24.84%11.40%8.88%-17.74%0.92%15.29%20.39%-14.55%31.44%
CNWIX
Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I
51.09%19.29%14.99%6.60%-24.35%-4.70%54.23%20.76%-17.74%36.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMRX and CNWIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2010

0.92

The correlation between VEMRX and CNWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMRX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMRX
VEMRX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CNWIX
CNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMRXCNWIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

3.17

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

3.79

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.57

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

4.48

-1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.23

16.56

-5.34

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the CNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMRX and CNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMRXCNWIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.17

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.49

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.51

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.36

-0.10

Drawdowns

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMRX drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, smaller than the maximum CNWIX drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMRX and CNWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMRXCNWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-43.57%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-16.28%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-19.34%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-37.36%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-43.57%

+7.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-16.43%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

4.39%

-1.44%

Volatility

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMRX) is 5.02%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that VEMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMRXCNWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

10.53%

-5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

20.15%

-8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

22.99%

-8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

18.45%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

24.47%

-8.01%

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMRX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison

VEMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than CNWIX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNWIX
Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I
0.04%0.06%0.00%0.54%0.97%2.79%2.01%1.04%0.00%0.42%0.00%0.38%
VEMRX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.37%2.79%3.19%3.53%4.11%2.63%1.92%3.26%2.92%2.35%2.56%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMRX and CNWIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNWIX has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to VEMRX (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMRX dropped -36.01% vs CNWIX's -43.57%.

CNWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMRX and CNWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer