VEMAX vs. VTABX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VEMAX (Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares) and VTABX (Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both mutual funds - VEMAX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, while VTABX is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index Hedged. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEMAX returned 8.79%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for VTABX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. VEMAX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTABX.

Performance

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VEMAX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMAX achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than VTABX's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VEMAX has outperformed VTABX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while VTABX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return.

VEMAX

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: 9.86%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 25.51%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 8.79%

VTABX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 1.74%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 1.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VEMAX Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares	9.86%	24.76%	11.34%	8.82%	-17.79%	0.85%	15.24%	20.29%	-14.59%	31.37%
VTABX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	0.56%	2.96%	3.92%	8.77%	-12.92%	-2.22%	4.54%	8.83%	2.97%	2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMAX and VTABX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013	-0.02

The correlation between VEMAX and VTABX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VEMAX	VTABX
Technology	29.6%	100.0%
Financial Services	19.5%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	-
Industrials	8.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	8.0%	-
Communication Services	7.1%	0.0%
Energy	4.6%	0.0%
Healthcare	3.9%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.9%	0.0%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.0%

Return for Risk

VEMAX vs. VTABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMAX

VEMAX Risk / Return Rank: 47
VEMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
VEMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VEMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
VEMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
VEMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

VTABX

VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 11
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VEMAX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VEMAX	VTABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.64	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	0.92	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.11	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	0.67	+1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	1.84	+5.98

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the VTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMAX and VTABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMAX drawdown since its inception was -66.45%, which is greater than VTABX's maximum drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMAX and VTABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEMAX	VTABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.45%	-16.16%	-50.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-2.90%	-8.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.78%	-2.90%	-12.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.46%	-15.81%	-16.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.11%	-16.16%	-19.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.60%	-1.30%	-2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.10%	-3.04%	-13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	1.06%	+1.97%

Volatility

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VEMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) at 1.27%. This indicates that VEMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEMAX	VTABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.17%	1.27%	+4.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.65%	2.61%	+10.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	3.08%	+11.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.50%	4.45%	+11.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	3.62%	+12.87%

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMAX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VTABX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VEMAX vs. VTABX - Dividend Comparison

VEMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than VTABX's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VEMAX Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares	2.42%	2.74%	3.13%	3.47%	4.05%	2.57%	1.87%	3.20%	2.85%	2.31%	2.51%	3.25%
VTABX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	4.46%	4.36%	4.33%	4.39%	1.48%	3.70%	1.08%	4.28%	3.00%	2.23%	1.80%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEMAX and VTABX in my portfolio?

VEMAX and VTABX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VEMAX or VTABX?

VEMAX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to VTABX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMAX dropped -66.45% vs VTABX's -16.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.