PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEMA.L is traded in GBP, while JPEA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JPEA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMA.L achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than JPEA.L's 2.25% return.


VEMA.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.43%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*

JPEA.L

1D
0.26%
1M
2.00%
YTD
2.25%
6M
1.66%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
7.07%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
1.66%4.15%8.11%3.45%-5.29%-0.35%2.49%8.03%
JPEA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.25%5.66%7.56%5.35%-8.87%-1.27%2.28%8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMA.L and JPEA.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.78

The correlation between VEMA.L and JPEA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMA.L
VEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEA.L
JPEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JPEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMA.LJPEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.77

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

8.06

-1.39

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the JPEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMA.L and JPEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMA.LJPEA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.75

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.32

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.20

+0.11

Drawdowns

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum JPEA.L drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMA.L and JPEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMA.LJPEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-21.10%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-4.49%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.38%

-9.34%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.41%

-14.61%

+3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-7.35%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.55%

+0.06%

Volatility

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) is 1.47%, while iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L) has a volatility of 2.39%. This indicates that VEMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMA.LJPEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

2.39%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.07%

5.76%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.85%

7.13%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.14%

9.51%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.49%

11.11%

-1.62%

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JPEA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMA.L vs. JPEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VEMA.L nor JPEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMA.L and JPEA.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEMA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPEA.L.

VEMA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while JPEA.L tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VEMA.L and 0.45% for JPEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMA.L and JPEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer