PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEMA.L is traded in GBP, while EMD5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMD5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMA.L achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than EMD5.L's -1.42% return.


VEMA.L

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.69%
6M
1.26%
YTD
1.58%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*

EMD5.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
-2.04%
6M
0.33%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
1.58%4.17%8.10%3.45%-5.29%-0.35%0.09%
EMD5.L
L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-1.42%2.30%10.30%2.45%0.24%0.67%-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMA.L and EMD5.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.68

The correlation between VEMA.L and EMD5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMA.L
VEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EMD5.L
EMD5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEMA.LEMD5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.07

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

0.37

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.76

0.91

+3.84

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMA.L and EMD5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than EMD5.L's maximum drawdown of -12.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMA.L and EMD5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMA.LEMD5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.39%

-12.98%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.40%

-6.62%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-7.39%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.46%

-12.98%

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-3.43%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.59%

-4.59%

-11.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.71%

-1.03%

Volatility

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) is 1.49%, while L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that VEMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMD5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMA.LEMD5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

2.12%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.19%

5.37%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

6.74%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

8.09%

+7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

7.96%

+9.12%

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VEMA.L and EMD5.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEMA.L vs. EMD5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VEMA.L nor EMD5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EMD5.L
L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%5.66%6.09%4.60%3.04%1.25%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMA.L and EMD5.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEMA.L and EMD5.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

VEMA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EMD5.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and L&G.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMA.L and EMD5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer