PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEGA vs. WLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEGA vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEGA achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 29.55% return.


VEGA

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.04%
YTD
7.10%
6M
6.87%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.95%

WLDR

1D
-1.18%
1M
11.85%
YTD
29.55%
6M
34.62%
1Y
57.12%
3Y*
32.72%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEGA vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
7.10%15.83%11.20%15.12%-15.02%12.36%8.37%19.29%-9.26%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
29.55%31.24%22.74%18.93%-10.44%26.77%-1.93%21.54%-20.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VEGA and WLDR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.65

The correlation between VEGA and WLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEGA vs. WLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEGA
WLDR

Technology

31.7%
29.9%

Financial Services

14.6%
13.4%

Industrials

10.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.2%

Communication Services

9.3%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
9.1%

Energy

3.5%
4.7%

Utilities

2.6%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

VEGA
31.7%
WLDR
29.9%

Financial Services

VEGA
14.6%
WLDR
13.4%

Industrials

VEGA
10.8%
WLDR
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VEGA
10.1%
WLDR
6.2%

Communication Services

VEGA
9.3%
WLDR
10.9%

Healthcare

VEGA
8.4%
WLDR
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

VEGA
4.6%
WLDR
9.1%

Energy

VEGA
3.5%
WLDR
4.7%

Utilities

VEGA
2.6%
WLDR
2.7%

Basic Materials

VEGA
2.6%
WLDR
3.5%

Real Estate

VEGA
1.8%
WLDR
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEGA vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

WLDR
WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEGA vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEGAWLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.65

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

6.48

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

26.24

-13.83

VEGA vs. WLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the WLDR Sharpe Ratio of 3.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEGA and WLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEGAWLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.83

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.06

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Drawdowns

VEGA vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEGA drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGA and WLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEGAWLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-44.69%

+16.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-8.86%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-20.30%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

-23.77%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-1.46%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-8.63%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

2.18%

-0.66%

Volatility

VEGA vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) is 2.71%, while Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that VEGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEGAWLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

5.63%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

12.11%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

15.00%

-5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

17.22%

-4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

20.94%

-8.24%

VEGA vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEGA has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEGA vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison

VEGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than WLDR's 7.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.25%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
7.05%9.01%13.99%2.28%2.10%7.55%1.80%2.48%2.82%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEGA and WLDR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WLDR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to VEGA (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEGA dropped -28.37% vs WLDR's -44.69%.

On 5-year performance, WLDR leads with 18.09% vs 7.25% for VEGA. On fees, WLDR is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WLDR is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 1.25% for VEGA.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.02% for VEGA and 0.67% for WLDR.

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEGA and WLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer