PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEGA vs. THMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEGA vs. THMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEGA achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly higher than THMZ's 3.67% return.


VEGA

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.95%
YTD
6.92%
6M
6.45%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
8.06%

THMZ

1D
2.01%
1M
1.76%
YTD
3.67%
6M
4.54%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEGA vs. THMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VEGA and THMZ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.87

The correlation between VEGA and THMZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEGA vs. THMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

THMZ
THMZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
THMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
THMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
THMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
THMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEGA vs. THMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEGATHMZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

0.98

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

3.51

+8.76

VEGA vs. THMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the THMZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEGA and THMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEGA vs. THMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEGA drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, which is greater than THMZ's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGA and THMZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEGATHMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-15.99%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-15.99%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.29%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-2.59%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

4.46%

-2.90%

Volatility

VEGA vs. THMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) is 3.65%, while Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that VEGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEGATHMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

6.31%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

13.61%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.55%

16.37%

-6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

19.09%

-6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

19.09%

-6.35%

VEGA vs. THMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEGA has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than THMZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEGA vs. THMZ - Dividend Comparison

VEGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than THMZ's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
THMZ
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
0.23%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.26%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEGA and THMZ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THMZ has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to VEGA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEGA dropped -28.37% vs THMZ's -15.99%.

On 1-year performance, VEGA leads with 19.11% vs 16.55% for THMZ. On fees, THMZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VEGA has performed better with a 19.11% return vs 16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THMZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.23% for THMZ.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 2.02% for VEGA and 0.50% for THMZ.

VEGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEGA and THMZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer