PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap Ex US (VEF.TO) and iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEF.TO achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than CIE.NEO's 17.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEF.TO having a 11.33% annualized return and CIE.NEO not far ahead at 11.89%.


VEF.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
7.02%
YTD
16.05%
6M
18.30%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
11.33%

CIE.NEO

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.26%
YTD
17.83%
6M
19.92%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEF.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap Ex US
16.05%24.61%10.91%18.02%-7.54%18.04%2.10%22.61%-11.96%16.90%
CIE.NEO
iShares International Fundamental Common Class
17.83%34.92%12.83%15.59%-2.83%14.42%1.33%11.29%-8.19%16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VEF.TO and CIE.NEO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011

0.73

The correlation between VEF.TO and CIE.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEF.TO
VEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CIE.NEO
CIE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CIE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap Ex US (VEF.TO) and iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEF.TOCIE.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.54

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.57

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.77

14.78

-0.01

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the CIE.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEF.TO and CIE.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEF.TOCIE.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.85

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

1.13

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.66

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.44

+0.27

Drawdowns

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum CIE.NEO drawdown of -40.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEF.TO and CIE.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEF.TOCIE.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.03%

-40.08%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-11.10%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-15.44%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.35%

-20.55%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.03%

-40.08%

+7.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.39%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-7.13%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.68%

-0.38%

Volatility

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap Ex US (VEF.TO) and iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEF.TOCIE.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

4.85%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

11.56%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

13.95%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

13.85%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

18.19%

-2.69%

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEF.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CIE.NEO's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEF.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Dividend Comparison

VEF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than CIE.NEO's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIE.NEO
iShares International Fundamental Common Class
2.12%2.53%2.82%3.08%3.32%2.89%2.15%3.63%3.12%2.67%2.80%2.44%
VEF.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap Ex US
2.05%2.61%2.55%2.50%2.21%2.55%1.73%2.41%2.64%2.21%2.31%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEF.TO and CIE.NEO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEF.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEF.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CIE.NEO.

VEF.TO tracks Spliced FTSE Developed ex US Index Hedged in CAD, while CIE.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Developed ex US 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VEF.TO and 0.73% for CIE.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEF.TO and CIE.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer