PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDY.TO achieves a 21.16% return, which is significantly higher than CGL-C.TO's 4.95% return.


VDY.TO

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.42%
YTD
21.16%
6M
21.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGL-C.TO

1D
0.54%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
4.95%
6M
6.74%
1Y
34.64%
3Y*
32.37%
5Y*
21.43%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF
21.16%21.33%
CGL-C.TO
iShares Gold Bullion ETF
4.95%29.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDY.TO

CGL-C.TO
CGL-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CGL-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGL-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGL-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CGL-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGL-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDY.TOCGL-C.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.72

0.60

+5.12

Drawdowns

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum CGL-C.TO drawdown of -33.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDY.TOCGL-C.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-33.04%

+29.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-14.88%

+14.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.43%

-12.24%

+11.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.12%

Volatility

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDY.TOCGL-C.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.31%

25.34%

-17.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.31%

16.97%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

15.56%

-7.25%

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDY.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CGL-C.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Dividend Comparison

VDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while CGL-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGL-C.TO
iShares Gold Bullion ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF
2.89%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDY.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CGL-C.TO.

VDY.TO is categorized as Dividend, while CGL-C.TO is Precious Metals. VDY.TO tracks FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index, while CGL-C.TO tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDY.TO and 0.55% for CGL-C.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer