VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO
VDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF) and CGL-C.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDY.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index, while CGL-C.TO is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDY.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CGL-C.TO.
Performance
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDY.TO achieves a 21.16% return, which is significantly higher than CGL-C.TO's 4.95% return.
VDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 21.16%
- 6M
- 21.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGL-C.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 34.64%
- 3Y*
- 32.37%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 21.16% | 21.33% |
CGL-C.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF | 4.95% | 29.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VDY.TO
CGL-C.TO
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CGL-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDY.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.72 | 0.60 | +5.12 |
Drawdowns
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum CGL-C.TO drawdown of -33.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDY.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -33.04% | +29.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -14.88% | +14.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.43% | -12.24% | +11.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.12% | — |
Volatility
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDY.TO | CGL-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.31% | 25.34% | -17.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 16.97% | -8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 15.56% | -7.25% |
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDY.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CGL-C.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDY.TO vs. CGL-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
VDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while CGL-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGL-C.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.89% | 3.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDY.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CGL-C.TO.
VDY.TO is categorized as Dividend, while CGL-C.TO is Precious Metals. VDY.TO tracks FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index, while CGL-C.TO tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDY.TO and 0.55% for CGL-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for VDY.TO and CGL-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer