VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO
VDU.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDU.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDU.TO returned 12.05%/yr vs 16.63%/yr for XDIV.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDU.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDU.TO achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 20.26% return.
VDU.TO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 33.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 20.26%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.63%
- 10Y*
- —
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 16.55% | 27.97% | 11.37% | 14.56% | -9.89% | 10.23% | 7.06% | 15.90% | -8.11% | 4.82% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 20.26% | 24.92% | 19.56% | 11.71% | 0.29% | 32.25% | -7.81% | 24.84% | -10.04% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDU.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VDU.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
Industrials
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Technology
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
Healthcare
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Basic Materials
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
Consumer Defensive
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Energy
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
Communication Services
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
Utilities
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
Real Estate
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VDU.TO
XDIV.TO
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDU.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 2.09 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 17.45 | -14.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 59.31 | -47.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDU.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 5.17 | -2.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.59 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.82 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDU.TO and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDU.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -41.30% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -2.33% | -9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -10.53% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -17.60% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -4.25% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 0.68% | +2.09% |
Volatility
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that VDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDU.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 2.81% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 6.37% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 7.89% | +6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 10.53% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 16.00% | -1.25% |
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDU.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDU.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
VDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 2.09% | 2.61% | 2.55% | 2.54% | 2.14% | 2.67% | 1.64% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.26% | 2.41% | 2.25% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.26% | 3.81% | 4.29% | 4.20% | 3.95% | 3.58% | 4.58% | 4.02% | 4.85% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDU.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VDU.TO.
VDU.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. VDU.TO tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDU.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for VDU.TO and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer