PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDU.TO achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly higher than QDX.TO's 14.10% return.


VDU.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
-1.58%
6M
9.52%
YTD
16.08%
1Y
30.94%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
10.12%
ALL TIME*
9.93%

QDX.TO

1D
-0.49%
1M
-1.06%
6M
8.38%
YTD
14.10%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$357.51KCA$296.06KCA$600.37K
CA$601.69KCA$734.63KCA$1.16M

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VDU.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF
16.08%27.97%11.37%14.56%-9.89%10.22%7.06%15.90%-10.21%
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF
14.10%25.29%12.93%13.65%-8.61%11.24%5.06%15.27%-8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VDU.TO and QDX.TO is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.63

Over the past year, VDU.TO and QDX.TO have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDU.TO
QDX.TO

Financial Services

23.1%
24.6%

Technology

18.5%
12.4%

Industrials

17.8%
19.0%

Healthcare

7.9%
10.4%

Basic Materials

7.1%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
6.7%

Energy

4.4%
3.4%

Utilities

3.1%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.8%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.0%

Financial Services

VDU.TO
23.1%
QDX.TO
24.6%

Technology

VDU.TO
18.5%
QDX.TO
12.4%

Industrials

VDU.TO
17.8%
QDX.TO
19.0%

Healthcare

VDU.TO
7.9%
QDX.TO
10.4%

Basic Materials

VDU.TO
7.1%
QDX.TO
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VDU.TO
6.9%
QDX.TO
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

VDU.TO
5.4%
QDX.TO
6.7%

Energy

VDU.TO
4.4%
QDX.TO
3.4%

Utilities

VDU.TO
3.1%
QDX.TO
3.7%

Communication Services

VDU.TO
2.8%
QDX.TO
4.3%

Real Estate

VDU.TO
2.3%
QDX.TO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VDU.TO
VDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QDX.TO
QDX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDU.TOQDX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.42

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

9.28

+0.84

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDU.TO and QDX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, roughly equal to the maximum QDX.TO drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDU.TO and QDX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDU.TOQDX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.19%

-28.08%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-10.88%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-14.25%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-23.55%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-1.38%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-4.48%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.83%

+0.15%

Volatility

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) at 4.13%. This indicates that VDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDU.TOQDX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

4.13%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.35%

12.78%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

14.89%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

14.11%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

15.45%

-0.78%

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDU.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QDX.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Dividend Comparison

VDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than QDX.TO's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF
2.34%2.51%2.48%2.61%2.73%2.25%1.91%2.76%3.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDU.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF
2.02%2.61%2.55%2.54%2.14%2.66%1.64%2.48%2.61%2.25%2.41%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VDU.TO and QDX.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VDU.TO.

VDU.TO tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDU.TO and 0.17% for QDX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDU.TO and QDX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer