VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO
VDU.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF) and QDX.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - VDU.TO tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index while QDX.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDU.TO returned 11.64%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for QDX.TO. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VDU.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for QDX.TO.
Performance
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDU.TO achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly higher than QDX.TO's 14.10% return.
VDU.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 30.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.93%
QDX.TO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$357.51K | CA$296.06K | CA$600.37K | |
| CA$601.69K | CA$734.63K | CA$1.16M |
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 16.08% | 27.97% | 11.37% | 14.56% | -9.89% | 10.22% | 7.06% | 15.90% | -10.21% |
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 14.10% | 25.29% | 12.93% | 13.65% | -8.61% | 11.24% | 5.06% | 15.27% | -8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDU.TO and QDX.TO is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, VDU.TO and QDX.TO have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Technology
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Industrials
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Healthcare
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Basic Materials
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Consumer Defensive
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Energy
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Utilities
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Communication Services
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Real Estate
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VDU.TO
QDX.TO
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDU.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.42 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.12 | 9.28 | +0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, roughly equal to the maximum QDX.TO drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDU.TO and QDX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDU.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -28.08% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -10.88% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -14.25% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -23.55% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -1.38% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -4.48% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.83% | +0.15% |
Volatility
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF (VDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) at 4.13%. This indicates that VDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDU.TO | QDX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 4.13% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 12.78% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 14.89% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 14.11% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 15.45% | -0.78% |
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDU.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QDX.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDU.TO vs. QDX.TO - Dividend Comparison
VDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than QDX.TO's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.34% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.25% | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDU.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index ETF | 2.02% | 2.61% | 2.55% | 2.54% | 2.14% | 2.66% | 1.64% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, VDU.TO and QDX.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VDU.TO.
VDU.TO tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VDU.TO and 0.17% for QDX.TO.
Find the right allocation for VDU.TO and QDX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer