PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPA.L achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than VWRD.L's 11.74% return.


VDPA.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*

VWRD.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
4.44%
YTD
11.74%
6M
13.36%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VDPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.11%7.78%2.83%8.05%-14.88%-1.21%9.15%11.79%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.74%22.38%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%14.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VDPA.L and VWRD.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.25

Over the past year, VDPA.L and VWRD.L have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPA.L
VDPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDPA.LVWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.44

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.33

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

14.02

-7.26

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPA.L and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDPA.LVWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

2.37

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.74

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.82

-0.49

Drawdowns

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPA.L drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, smaller than the maximum VWRD.L drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPA.L and VWRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDPA.LVWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-33.83%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-8.80%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.60%

-16.25%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.43%

-26.02%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.69%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-4.62%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

2.10%

-1.24%

Volatility

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) is 1.80%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that VDPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDPA.LVWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

3.88%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.59%

9.80%

-6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.54%

12.40%

-7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

15.32%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.78%

15.72%

-6.94%

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDPA.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

VDPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDPA.L and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

VDPA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VWRD.L is Global Equities. VDPA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VDPA.L and 0.22% for VWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDPA.L and VWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer