PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDIV.DE achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than MWOL.DE's 10.87% return.


VDIV.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
9.79%
6M
12.68%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*

MWOL.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.87%
6M
10.90%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VDIV.DE
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
9.79%24.55%15.67%11.47%15.47%27.92%-11.00%10.26%
MWOL.DE
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist
10.87%8.53%25.60%18.54%-15.49%30.82%3.73%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VDIV.DE and MWOL.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2019

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between VDIV.DE and MWOL.DE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDIV.DE
VDIV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VDIV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MWOL.DE
MWOL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MWOL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDIV.DEMWOL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

3.67

+3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.46

14.63

+5.83

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDIV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the MWOL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDIV.DE and MWOL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDIV.DEMWOL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.17

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.45

0.83

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.77

+0.17

Drawdowns

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDIV.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, which is greater than MWOL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDIV.DE and MWOL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDIV.DEMWOL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-33.56%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-6.58%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-21.64%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.12%

-21.64%

+6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-0.37%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-4.89%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.65%

-0.40%

Volatility

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOL.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that VDIV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDIV.DEMWOL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.63%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

7.71%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.36%

11.12%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.92%

14.20%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

16.46%

-1.10%

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDIV.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOL.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDIV.DE vs. MWOL.DE - Dividend Comparison

VDIV.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than MWOL.DE's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MWOL.DE
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist
1.19%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDIV.DE
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.19%3.58%4.19%4.97%4.56%3.97%4.11%4.35%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDIV.DE and MWOL.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWOL.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWOL.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for VDIV.DE.

VDIV.DE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while MWOL.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index Net TR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VDIV.DE and 0.05% for MWOL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDIV.DE and MWOL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer