VDIG vs. ILCV

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VDIG (Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF) and ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VDIG is actively managed, while ILCV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VDIG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCV.

Performance

VDIG vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF (VDIG) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDIG achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than ILCV's 7.41% return.

VDIG

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILCV

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 7.28%
• 1Y: 27.01%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDIG vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF	-0.22%	3.68%
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	7.41%	4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VDIG and ILCV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

VDIG vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCV

ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 85
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDIG vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF (VDIG) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VDIG	ILCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.46	+0.11

Drawdowns

VDIG vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDIG and ILCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDIG	ILCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.20%	-58.63%	+47.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.55%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-1.27%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-9.32%	+6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VDIG	ILCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.34%	9.93%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.34%	14.22%	-2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.34%	16.67%	-5.33%

VDIG vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDIG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

VDIG vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

VDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than ILCV's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	1.63%	1.77%	1.99%	2.27%	2.32%	2.01%	2.96%	2.70%	2.93%	2.32%	2.76%	3.01%
VDIG Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDIG and ILCV in my portfolio?

VDIG and ILCV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VDIG or ILCV?

On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VDIG or ILCV?

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for VDIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VDIG or ILCV?

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.13% for VDIG.

What is the main difference between VDIG and ILCV?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for VDIG and 0.04% for ILCV.