PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDET.L vs. VEMT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VDET.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VDET.L is traded in USD, while VEMT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEMT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with VDET.L at 1.31% and VEMT.L at 1.31%.


VDET.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.85%
1Y
9.46%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*

VEMT.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.88%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDET.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.31%11.70%6.40%9.41%-15.27%-1.76%6.08%13.11%-2.74%8.10%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.31%11.92%6.28%8.89%-15.33%-1.46%5.67%14.07%-3.02%7.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VDET.L and VEMT.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2016

0.69

The correlation between VDET.L and VEMT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDET.L
VDET.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VDET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VDET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VDET.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDET.LVEMT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.48

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.75

9.13

+1.62

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDET.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDET.L and VEMT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDET.LVEMT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.66

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.29

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.40

+0.05

Drawdowns

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDET.L drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, roughly equal to the maximum VEMT.L drawdown of -24.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDET.L and VEMT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDET.LVEMT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.09%

-24.08%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.56%

-3.82%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-6.35%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

-24.06%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.58%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.07%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.04%

-0.16%

Volatility

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VDET.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) have volatilities of 1.79% and 1.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDET.LVEMT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

1.77%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.72%

4.48%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72%

5.71%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.17%

8.12%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.70%

8.61%

-0.91%

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDET.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than VEMT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDET.L vs. VEMT.L - Dividend Comparison

VDET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, which matches VEMT.L's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDET.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.91%6.03%5.84%5.44%5.01%3.89%4.19%4.32%4.61%4.59%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.92%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.44%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDET.L and VEMT.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDET.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDET.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEMT.L.

VDET.L tracks Bloomberg EM USD Sovereign + Quasi-Sov Index, while VEMT.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for VDET.L and 0.25% for VEMT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDET.L and VEMT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer