PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 8.03%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.


VDC

1D
0.65%
1M
0.43%
YTD
10.55%
6M
8.59%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.03%

VBR

1D
0.87%
1M
6.17%
YTD
14.60%
6M
12.92%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
10.55%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
14.60%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and VBR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and VBR has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VDC vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
VBR

Consumer Defensive

97.5%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
12.4%

Industrials

0.3%
18.1%

Basic Materials

0.3%
6.3%

Healthcare

0.0%
7.9%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Energy

-

5.2%

Financial Services

-

17.6%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Technology

-

10.6%

Utilities

-

4.8%

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.5%
VBR
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.8%
VBR
12.4%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
VBR
18.1%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.3%
VBR
6.3%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
VBR
7.9%

Communication Services

VDC

-

VBR
2.5%

Energy

VDC

-

VBR
5.2%

Financial Services

VDC

-

VBR
17.6%

Real Estate

VDC

-

VBR
10.1%

Technology

VDC

-

VBR
10.6%

Utilities

VDC

-

VBR
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDCVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.31

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

3.17

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

11.22

-9.62

VDC vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDC vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-61.98%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.85%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-24.19%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-24.19%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-45.28%

+19.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

0.00%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-8.26%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

2.50%

+2.07%

Volatility

VDC vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.43%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

10.65%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

15.36%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

19.79%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

21.74%

-7.08%

VDC vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDC vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than VBR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.71%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.08%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and VBR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to VBR (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.99% vs 8.03% for VDC. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDC.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.71% for VBR.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer