PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VDC vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VDC vs. BND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 7.59%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.

Performance

VDC vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 7.59%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.

VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%

BND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF		5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		0.27%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and BND is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

-0.05

The correlation between VDC and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

Often compared with VDC:
VDC vs. XLPVDC vs. VOOVDC vs. FSTAVDC vs. VCRVDC vs. IYKVDC vs. VTVVDC vs. KXI
Often compared with BND:
BND vs. BNDXBND vs. FXNAXBND vs. AGGBND vs. FBNDBND vs. BNDWBND vs. TLTBND vs. VBTLX

Return for Risk

VDC vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VDCBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.10
1.36

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.23
2.03

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.24

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

1.92

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

5.80

-5.52

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VDC vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VDCBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.36

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.01

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.29

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.59

+0.08

Drawdowns

VDC vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and BND.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VDCBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-18.58%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-2.68%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-5.92%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-17.91%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-18.58%

-6.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-2.37%

-6.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-3.06%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

0.88%

+3.61%

Volatility

VDC vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that VDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VDCBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

1.23%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

2.66%

+7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

3.78%

+8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

6.02%

+7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

5.53%

+9.11%

VDC vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VDC vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF		3.97%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF		2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

VDC and BND have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 10-year performance, VDC leads with 7.59% vs 1.58% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.59% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDC.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 2.17% for VDC.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.03% for BND.

BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer