PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCULX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Growth Fund (VCULX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCULX achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 1.54% return.


VCULX

1D
-2.08%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
6.36%
6M
4.73%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
16.15%

SWLGX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
1.54%
6M
0.06%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCULX
VALIC Company I Growth Fund
6.36%10.84%32.74%46.14%-35.17%20.88%42.64%31.75%-6.16%-0.94%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
1.54%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VCULX and SWLGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.98

The correlation between VCULX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCULX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCULX
VCULX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VCULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCULX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VCULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCULX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Growth Fund (VCULX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCULXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

3.67

+0.26

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCULX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCULX drawdown since its inception was -51.32%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCULX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCULXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.32%

-32.69%

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.39%

-16.16%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.46%

-23.30%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.13%

-32.69%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-6.86%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-7.04%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

4.93%

-0.10%

Volatility

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

VALIC Company I Growth Fund (VCULX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 6.09%. This indicates that VCULX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCULXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

6.09%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.99%

12.64%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.34%

16.27%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.28%

21.62%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

22.69%

-0.63%

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCULX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCULX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

VCULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.07%, more than SWLGX's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.45%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%
VCULX
VALIC Company I Growth Fund
11.07%0.00%0.07%30.05%37.81%12.80%7.28%7.63%0.63%6.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VCULX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCULX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to SWLGX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCULX dropped -51.32% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCULX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer