PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCSH vs. TMRAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCSH vs. TMRAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCSH achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than TMRAF's -25.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VCSH has underperformed TMRAF with an annualized return of 2.70%, while TMRAF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.


VCSH

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.70%

TMRAF

1D
0.00%
1M
10.49%
YTD
-25.86%
6M
-21.73%
1Y
-41.87%
3Y*
-12.60%
5Y*
-9.33%
10Y*
13.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCSH vs. TMRAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.80%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%
TMRAF
Tomra Systems ASA
-25.86%7.13%13.87%-32.05%-27.02%50.97%51.54%46.27%48.12%82.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VCSH and TMRAF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCSH vs. TMRAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TMRAF
TMRAF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMRAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMRAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMRAF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TMRAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMRAF Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCSH vs. TMRAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCSHTMRAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.81

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

-0.89

+4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

-1.62

+14.57

VCSH vs. TMRAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the TMRAF Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCSH and TMRAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCSH vs. TMRAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCSH drawdown since its inception was -12.86%, smaller than the maximum TMRAF drawdown of -71.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCSH and TMRAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCSHTMRAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-71.64%

+58.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-47.39%

+45.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-56.94%

+55.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.48%

-71.64%

+62.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

-71.64%

+58.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-59.80%

+59.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-20.67%

+19.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

25.82%

-25.48%

Volatility

VCSH vs. TMRAF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) is 0.66%, while Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that VCSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCSHTMRAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

19.08%

-18.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

40.28%

-38.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

52.03%

-50.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

58.61%

-55.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

49.87%

-46.52%

Dividends

VCSH vs. TMRAF - Dividend Comparison

VCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than TMRAF's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMRAF
Tomra Systems ASA
0.23%1.55%1.39%1.49%1.94%1.01%0.62%1.62%4.28%13.33%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCSH and TMRAF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMRAF has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to VCSH (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCSH dropped -12.86% vs TMRAF's -71.64%.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCSH and TMRAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer