PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCSH vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCSH vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCSH achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than PYLD's 0.98% return.


VCSH

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.09%
6M
0.60%
YTD
0.92%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
2.65%
ALL TIME*
2.90%

PYLD

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.76%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$87.11M$100.81M$103.51M
$313.19M$294.57M$337.26M

VCSH vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.92%6.77%4.91%4.25%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
0.98%9.57%7.69%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VCSH and PYLD is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.83

The correlation between VCSH and PYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCSH vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VCSH vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCSHPYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.53

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

6.57

+2.44

VCSH vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCSH and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCSH vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCSH drawdown since its inception was -12.86%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCSH and PYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCSHPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-4.52%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-3.25%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-3.88%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.98%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.64%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.75%

-0.39%

Volatility

VCSH vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) is 0.55%, while PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that VCSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCSHPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.88%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

2.73%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

3.08%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.90%

3.96%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

3.96%

-0.61%

VCSH vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCSH has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCSH vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

VCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than PYLD's 6.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.44%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.47%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCSH and PYLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYLD has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to VCSH (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCSH dropped -12.86% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

On 3-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.93% vs 5.42% for VCSH. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.93% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.44%, compared with 4.47% for VCSH.

VCSH is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCSH and 0.55% for PYLD.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCSH and PYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer