PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCRM vs. VPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCRM vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCRM achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than VPLS's 0.64% return.


VCRM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.36%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VPLS

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCRM vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VCRM
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.95%4.91%-0.58%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
0.64%7.86%-0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VCRM and VPLS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.66

The correlation between VCRM and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCRM vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRM
VCRM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VCRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRM vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRMVPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.29

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.18

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

7.10

+4.09

VCRM vs. VPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRM Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the VPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRM and VPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRMVPLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.63

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.24

-0.17

Drawdowns

VCRM vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VPLS drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRM and VPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRMVPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-4.17%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-2.72%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.21%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-1.01%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.83%

-0.10%

Volatility

VCRM vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) is 0.98%, while Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that VCRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRMVPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

1.27%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

2.69%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

3.65%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.89%

4.61%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.89%

4.61%

-0.72%

VCRM vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCRM vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison

VCRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than VPLS's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
VCRM
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.64%3.42%0.40%0.00%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.76%4.78%4.52%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCRM and VPLS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPLS has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to VCRM (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRM dropped -4.12% vs VPLS's -4.17%.

On 1-year performance, VCRM leads with 8.18% vs 5.91% for VPLS. On fees, VCRM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VCRM has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VCRM has performed better with a 8.18% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCRM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VPLS.

VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 3.64% for VCRM.

VCRM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while VPLS is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCRM and 0.20% for VPLS.

VCRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCRM and VPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer