PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCRM vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCRM vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VCRM having a 1.95% return and JAAA slightly lower at 1.87%.


VCRM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.36%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JAAA

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.45%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCRM vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VCRM
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.95%4.91%-0.58%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
1.87%5.16%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VCRM and JAAA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCRM vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRM
VCRM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VCRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRM vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRMJAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

2.69

-1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

13.07

-10.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

70.18

-58.98

VCRM vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRM Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 5.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRM and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRMJAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

5.98

-3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

2.77

-1.71

Drawdowns

VCRM vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRM and JAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRMJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-2.64%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-0.39%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.02%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-0.25%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.07%

+0.66%

Volatility

VCRM vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that VCRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRMJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.13%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

0.64%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

0.85%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.89%

1.68%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.89%

1.64%

+2.25%

VCRM vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCRM vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

VCRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than JAAA's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
5.00%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%
VCRM
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.64%3.42%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCRM and JAAA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCRM has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRM dropped -4.12% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

On 1-year performance, VCRM leads with 8.18% vs 5.06% for JAAA. On fees, VCRM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VCRM has performed better with a 8.18% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCRM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for JAAA.

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.64% for VCRM.

VCRM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCRM and 0.21% for JAAA.

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.98 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCRM and JAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer