VCRM vs. JAAA
VCRM (Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCRM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P Broad AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. VCRM is passively managed, while JAAA is actively managed. Over the past year, VCRM returned 8.18% vs 5.06% for JAAA. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VCRM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for JAAA.
Performance
VCRM vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VCRM having a 1.95% return and JAAA slightly lower at 1.87%.
VCRM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAAA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
VCRM vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.95% | 4.91% | -0.58% |
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 1.87% | 5.16% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCRM and JAAA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCRM vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank
VCRM
JAAA
VCRM vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCRM | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 2.69 | -1.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 13.07 | -10.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 70.18 | -58.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCRM | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 5.98 | -3.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 2.77 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
VCRM vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCRM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRM and JAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCRM | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -2.64% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -0.39% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.02% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -0.25% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.07% | +0.66% |
Volatility
VCRM vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that VCRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCRM | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 0.13% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 0.64% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 0.85% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 1.68% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 1.64% | +2.25% |
VCRM vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCRM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VCRM vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison
VCRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than JAAA's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 5.00% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% |
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.64% | 3.42% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCRM and JAAA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCRM has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRM dropped -4.12% vs JAAA's -2.64%.
On 1-year performance, VCRM leads with 8.18% vs 5.06% for JAAA. On fees, VCRM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VCRM has performed better with a 8.18% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCRM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for JAAA.
JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.64% for VCRM.
VCRM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCRM and 0.21% for JAAA.
JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.98 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCRM and JAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer