PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCRM vs. CA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VCRM vs. CA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VCRM vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VCRM
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
0.52%4.91%-0.58%
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
0.04%3.05%-0.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCRM achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than CA's 0.04% return.


VCRM

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
0.52%
6M
2.10%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CA

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
0.04%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VCRM vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCRM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

VCRM vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCRM
VCRM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VCRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CA
CA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCRM vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCRMCADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

0.84

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.11

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.09

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.37

3.10

+1.27

VCRM vs. CA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the CA Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCRM and CA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCRMCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.84

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.58

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between VCRM and CA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VCRM vs. CA - Dividend Comparison

VCRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than CA's 3.23% yield.


Drawdowns

VCRM vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCRM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum CA drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRM and CA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRMCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-5.24%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-3.67%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.88%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-1.30%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.29%

-0.16%

Volatility

VCRM vs. CA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) at 1.27%. This indicates that VCRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VCRMCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.27%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

1.77%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

4.38%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.00%

4.09%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.00%

4.09%

-0.09%