PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCR vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCR vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 33.13% return.


VCR

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.01%
6M
-4.33%
YTD
-0.08%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
13.26%

SBIT

1D
-7.55%
1M
-6.22%
6M
56.76%
YTD
33.13%
1Y
113.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCR vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-0.08%5.77%19.63%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
33.13%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VCR and SBIT is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCR vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCR vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCRSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.37

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

5.39

-4.13

VCR vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCR Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCR and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCR vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCRSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.54%

-91.35%

+29.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-47.94%

+32.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-78.87%

+74.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-68.85%

+59.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

21.08%

-15.86%

Volatility

VCR vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) is 5.65%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 23.66%. This indicates that VCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCRSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

23.66%

-18.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

69.36%

-55.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

88.70%

-69.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.15%

96.93%

-72.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

96.93%

-74.50%

VCR vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCR vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than SBIT's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.30%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.73%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCR and SBIT have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (23.66%) compared to VCR (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 113.21% vs 6.57% for VCR. On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VCR has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 113.21% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 0.73% for VCR.

VCR is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCR and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCR and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer